ENGG958,
ENGG958
Assignm
Assignme
Explore th
establishe
managem

Purpose:
Explore th
asset man
Learning
3. Select
situations

Working a
Complete
Asst4_ Fa
Assignme
Focusing o
(i) With r
asset
5.4). In
mana
proces
(ii) Identif
mana
i.e. Ide
asset
Assign
versa.
the as
NOTE: The
effectiven
Key issues
evaluation
In the case
determinin
physically
Maximum

Autumn 201
Life Cycle
ment Que
ent 4 (Indiv
he key issue
ed risk man
ment and as
he applicati
nagement.
objectives
and apply
.
arrangeme
this assign
amily Name
ent Task
on the asse
reference t
when desig
n particula
gement pro
sses by wh
fy the role
gement for
entify the re
manageme
nment 3; a
. In doing th
sset manag
e risks to b
ess: operat
s may typic
n of risks.
e of the bur
ng pipeline
y inspecting
2000 Wor
7
and Risk M
stions – 2
vidual) rev2
es of risk m
nagement s
sset manag
ion of the f
s covered:
y appropri
ent:
nment indiv
e.doc,: e.g.
et that you
o AS/NZS
gning and o
r, what are
ocess as de
hich risks a
and the ke
r these ass
elationship
ent activity
nd, b. risk m
his you sho
gement fra
be managed
ting reliabi
cally includ
ried pipelin
e condition
g the pipeli
rds

F
anagement
2017
2
managemen
standards.
gement.
undamenta
ate model
vidually. F
Asst4_Fia
studied pr
ISO 31000
operating t
e the signifi
efined in Cl
re assesse
y relations
sets.
ps between
y and the as
manageme
ould consid
mework de
d are restri
lity in parti
de, for exam
ne, you can
but no dire
ne.

Faculty of
t
nt and how
Identify the
al principle
ls and sta
ile names f
at.doc.
eviously:
: Identify th
the risk ass
cant featu
lause 5.3, a
ed.
ships betwe
n a. asset m
sset manag
ent and the
er where th
eveloped as
cted to ope
cular) and
mple, the id
assume th
ect method
Engineeri
w these issu
he relations
es of risk m
andards to
for submiss
he key issu
sessment p
res of the ‘
and how do
een asset m
managemen
gement sys
risk mana
he risk man
s part of As
erating per
also public
dentificatio
hat there ar
s with the e
ng and Inf
ues are han
ships betwe
anagemen
specific a
sions must
es to be ad
process as
context’ fo
o they impa
managemen
nt and the e
stem as yo
gement sy
nagement
ssignment
formance r
c and empl
n of credib
re various i
exception o
Page
formation S
ndled by
een risk
nt in the con
asset man
t be in the f
ddressed fo
described
r the risk
act on the
nt and risk
elements o
ou have def
ystem, and
process sit
3.
risk (system
loyee safet
le risks or t
indirect me
of excavati
1
Sciences
ntext of
nagement
form
or this
in Clause
of the
fined it in
vice
ts within
m
y risk.
the
ethods of
ng and
ENGG958, Autumn 2017 Page 2
Assessment Rubric – Assignment 4
Content Value Below
Expectation
(0-49%)
Acceptable
(50-64%)
Good
(65-84%)
Excellent
(85%+)
Systematic
approach to the
analysis is taken.
20% No process
evident
Process
referenced to
available
standards
Process
referenced to
available
standards and
other literature
Process referenced
to available
standards and
extensively to other
literature
Relevant
significant
features of
context
identified.
40% No, few, or only
irrelevant
features of
context identified
or impact not
explored
Some key
relevant
significant
features of
context identified
and impact
explored
Most key relevant
significant
features of
context identified
and impact
explored
All key relevant
significant features
of context
identified and
impact
comprehensively
explored
Relationships
between risk
management and
asset
management
identified.
30% Significant
interrelationships
& functions not
identified
Major functions &
interrelationships
identified
Functions &
interrelationships
identified
including the
significance of the
relationships
Insightful, fully
justified
interrelationships.
Allows
understanding of
the nature of asset
management and
its role within the
organisation.
Structure of
written work
(Assignment
overall)
10% Poorly organised Logical
development of
arguments
Report structured
in a competent
manner with
consistent logical
development
response
Report structured
in a professional
manner such that
report flows
seamlessly and flow
enhances
understanding.
Referencing
(Assignment
overall)
Reqd Unacceptable:
No referencing or
no in‐text citation
of references
(this is plagiarism,
refer to UOW
policies)
Acceptable:
Harvard system of referencing used. References cited in the
main body of the report where used and then listed correctly
in the References section at the back of the report.