Comments on: All Your Writing Clips on One Site: Cuttings.me Review and Interview https://productivewriters.com/2011/11/21/cuttings-me-review-writing-clips/ Work Less ~ Earn More ~ Live More Mon, 13 Dec 2021 15:17:25 +0000 hourly 1 By: MeganWrites Media https://productivewriters.com/2011/11/21/cuttings-me-review-writing-clips/#comment-5897 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:57:18 +0000 http://productivewriters.com/?p=2677#comment-5897 Good share! I will have to give that a shot. Thanks, John!

]]>
By: John Soares https://productivewriters.com/2011/11/21/cuttings-me-review-writing-clips/#comment-5882 Tue, 21 Feb 2012 03:22:53 +0000 http://productivewriters.com/?p=2677#comment-5882 In reply to Jessie Gamble.

Jessie, one of the benefits of a site like Cuttings.me is that it will eventually draw a lot of search engine traffic, which makes it more likely your work will be viewed by an editor. Most writers’ websites have little visibility in search engines.

]]>
By: Jessie Gamble https://productivewriters.com/2011/11/21/cuttings-me-review-writing-clips/#comment-5870 Mon, 20 Feb 2012 08:40:59 +0000 http://productivewriters.com/?p=2677#comment-5870 I suppose I can see the value for someone who doesn’t have a website….but it’s so easy today to put together a simple site, I would still recommend that route. John, as I understand fair use, you should be able to post short excerpts for anything you have written.

]]>
By: Nicholas Holmes https://productivewriters.com/2011/11/21/cuttings-me-review-writing-clips/#comment-4969 Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:14:16 +0000 http://productivewriters.com/?p=2677#comment-4969 In reply to John Soares.

Hi John – yes, they will be, at the moment. That said, it would be a very simple thing to stop if required. Google has been really good at picking up the structure of the site so far though (displaying clips under names hierarchically, etc) so I don’t see it as a tremendous problem. Anyone disagree?

]]>
By: Dave Doolin https://productivewriters.com/2011/11/21/cuttings-me-review-writing-clips/#comment-4968 Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:12:05 +0000 http://productivewriters.com/?p=2677#comment-4968 In reply to Dave Doolin.

Argh… properties of the algorithm: titles really matter, a lot.

By “professional SEO” I mean someone charging at $100/hr and delivering solid results for clients.

]]>
By: Anne Wayman https://productivewriters.com/2011/11/21/cuttings-me-review-writing-clips/#comment-4970 Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:11:57 +0000 http://productivewriters.com/?p=2677#comment-4970 In reply to Dave Doolin.

Dave, maybe penalty isn’t the right word… I don’t pretend to know what google does. What I can tell you is that duplicate content did prevent a listing for aboutfreelancewriting.com back in the beginning until I emailed an explanation… I’d moved content from what had been my writing site at about.com and about didn’t get it down very quickly even tho’ they said the would.

Once I wrote google, although they never responded, my new site started showing up. So I take the duplicate content thing seriously.

]]>
By: Dave Doolin https://productivewriters.com/2011/11/21/cuttings-me-review-writing-clips/#comment-4967 Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:10:06 +0000 http://productivewriters.com/?p=2677#comment-4967 In reply to Anne Wayman.

Gaaak. This thread won’t leave me alone…

Anne, that’s a stupendously relevant question, and in my opinion, the only people who can answer “correctly” are Google engineers and professional SEOs. Given the complexity of a ranking algorithm with thousands of signals (per Google’s documentation), the professional SEOs probably understand as well as the Google engineers. (Complexity induces emergent behavior.)

That said, from what I understand from reading Google, there is no “penalty” per se. It’s a matter of what Google decides is the most relevant result of similar results, and that’s what gets displayed.

You infer properties of the algorithm from this. For example, I once ranked for “practical wordpress tips,” having written 19 articles leading with that in the title. Never mind the tips were all different, Google only showed the most relevant, hiding all the rest under a “Show similar results” link.

But…

This works fine for me. I don’t see it as a penalty, I see as Google helping me out by delivering more results than asked for.

I could write more, but I have a lonely bird looking for an oven and flock of hungry birds winging down this evening.

]]>
By: Dave Doolin https://productivewriters.com/2011/11/21/cuttings-me-review-writing-clips/#comment-4963 Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:27:20 +0000 http://productivewriters.com/?p=2677#comment-4963 In reply to Nicholas Holmes.

Excellent, next week then.

]]>
By: Nicholas Holmes https://productivewriters.com/2011/11/21/cuttings-me-review-writing-clips/#comment-4962 Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:15:49 +0000 http://productivewriters.com/?p=2677#comment-4962 In reply to Dave Doolin.

Haha yes I got an alert on the error and saw what you were up to – I put it down to a healthy curiosity! Look forward to connecting with you soon – enjoy Thanksgiving!

]]>
By: Dave Doolin https://productivewriters.com/2011/11/21/cuttings-me-review-writing-clips/#comment-4961 Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:12:04 +0000 http://productivewriters.com/?p=2677#comment-4961 In reply to Nicholas Holmes.

Nicholas, I managed to get a server error which looks suspiciously like what Heroku serves up (which is very cool, btw). If you check your logs, you will see that I was requesting my profile link in xml format.

We’re about to kick off huge Thanksgiving weekend holiday here, so I’m out of commission from about now until Monday. Expect to hear from me next week!

]]>